Focus and Scope
Concrete Technology serial number for the international standard ISSN1002-3550, Concrete Technology magazine is a professional journal in the concrete industry, fast, widely conveyed concrete industry information. This publication introduces international concrete technical standards and timely exchanges of technical innovations in concrete and building components. Advocate the concept of “producing opportunities for readers, authors, and advertisers, and providing value-added services” to further improve the level of running the magazine so that “concrete technology” becomes the leading media to understand the development of the industry, cutting-edge technology, and innovation, and the importance of academic exchange Parkland, editorial policy: Committed to promoting the development of the concrete industry, providing policy information, market trends, development status and prospects for concrete companies and scientific researchers; promoting new materials, new technologies, new equipment and new processes in the concrete industry; dissemination of production Information on management, engineering practices, testing standards, performance testing and patented technologies.
Main columns: theoretical research; raw materials and auxiliary materials; ready-mixed concrete; concrete products; production processes and equipment; production management; industry information, etc.
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to USP journals undergo a rigorous peer review process, in which most of our peer reviews are single blind (unless stated otherwise).
All submitted manuscript are firstly handled by our managing editor, who will check the manuscript for plagiarism, in which rejection of the manuscript can take place at this stage by the managing editor if plagiarism occurs in the manuscript.
After the plagiarism check is completed and results are deemed satisfactory, the managing editor will pass the manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief who will undertake the peer review process, or at times pass the task to one of the Associate Editor.
A minimum of 2 reviewers will be selected from the pool of reviewers available according to their expertise and suitability to the subject matter of the manuscript. Reviewers will have to give their comments and recommendations (Accept, Major Revisions, Reject) to the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor for them to make a final decision on the paper, and their comments will help the authors improve their papers.
Upon recommendations by the reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editor can make a final decision on the paper and inform the author on their decision, adding comments to the Authors to make improvements in their research or paper.
Typically there are 3 main decisions in the peer review process – Accept, Major Revisions or Reject. If the Editor-in-Chief accepts the paper, it could be split into Minor revisions (author to make minor amendments to the paper) or No revisions (no amendments required by author), after which the paper can be sent to the Editing stage.
If the decision is a Major Revision, the authors are required to make the changes as suggested in the comments accordingly and the paper will be resubmitted for a second (or third) round of review. If the decision is to Reject the manuscript, the author will be notified and the rejected manuscript will be archived and the peer review process ends.
An accepted paper will be sent for Copy Editing, Layout Editing and Proofreading before publication of the paper. Correspondence between the authors and USP will be required here in order to improve the language and/or look of the manuscript. After the Editing stage is completed, authors are required to check the PDF file of the final version before the article is published. USP registers DOI for the manuscript before publishing it on our site, in which the article is immediately accessible to the public.