• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Problem Formulation Research: From Systems Theory to Discovery of System Pathology

Polinpapilinho Katina

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to communicate the nature of problems using systems theory. The importance of problem formulation is provided. Then, the nature system pathologies (aberrant conditions and factors) affecting performance in complex systems is provided. A method (M-Path) that can be used to guide practitioners through the identification and assessment of pathological conditions that negatively impact the healthy or normal functioning of a system is described. The paper concluded with research implications and suggested research.

Keywords


M-Path; System pathology; Problem formulation; Systems theory

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: A systems approach to societal problems. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Adams, K. G., & Meyers, T. J. (2011). Perspective 1 of the SoSE methodology: Framing the system under study. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 2(2/3), 163–192.

Adams, K. M., Hester, P. T., Bradley, J. M., Meyers, T. J., & Keating, C. B. (2014). Systems theory as the foundation for understanding systems. Systems Engineering, 17(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21255

Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2581927

Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2006). Systems engineering and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Pearson - Prentice Hall.

Crownover, M. W. B. (2005). Complex system contextual framework (CSCF): A grounded-theory construction for the articulation of system context in addressing complex systems problems (Dissertation). Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA -- United States.

Dery, D. (1984). Problem definition in policy analysis. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Fairhurst, G. T., & Sarr, R. A. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. F. (2007). How to do systems analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Katina, P. F. (2015). Systems theory-based construct for identifying metasystem pathologies for complex system governance (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, United States -- Virginia.

Katina, P. F. (2016). Systems theory as a foundation for discovery of pathologies for complex system problem formulation. In A. J. Masys (Ed.), Applications of Systems Thinking and Soft Operations Research in Managing Complexity (pp. 227–267).

Geneva, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-21106-0_11

Katina, P. F., & Calida, B. Y. (2017a). Complex system analysis for engineering of systemic failures. In M. Hopkins (Ed.), Systems Engineering: Concepts, Tools and Applications (pp. 105–132). New York: NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Katina, P. F., & Calida, B. Y. (2017b). Complex System Governance: Implications and research directions [White paper]. Submitted to the Committee on a Decadal Survey of Social and Behavioral Sciences for Applications to National Security, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Retrieved from Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/bbcss/dbasse_178412

Keating, C. B., & Katina, P. F. (2012). Prevalence of pathologies in systems of systems. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 3(3/4), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSE.2012.052688

Keating, C. B., Katina, P. F., & Bradley, J. M. (2014). Complex system governance: Concept, challenges, and emerging research. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 5(3), 263–288.

Majone, G., & Quade, E. S. (Eds.). (1980). Pitfalls of analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Théorêt, A. (1976). The structure of the “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.

Miser, H. J., & Quade, E. S. (1988). Handbook of systems analysis: Craft issues and procedural choices (Vol. 2). New York, NY: North-Holland.

Quade, E. S. (1980). Pitfalls in formulation and modeling. In G. Majone & E. S. Quade (Eds.), Pitfalls of analysis (Vol. 8, pp. 23–43). Chichester, England: Wiley-Interscience.

Quade, E. S., & Miser, H. J. (1985). The context, nature, and use of systems analysis. In H. S. Misser & E. S. Quade (Eds.), Handbook of systems analysis: Overview of uses, procedures, applications, and practice (pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Vennix, J. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics (1st ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems: Planning, policy and complexity. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.

Wellington, A. M. (1887). The economic theory of the location of railways. New York, NY: Wiley.

Young, O. R. (1964). A survey of general systems theory. General Systems, 9, 61–80.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/mmf.v1i2.969

Refbacks
Copyright © 2020 Universe Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved.