Critically Evaluate the Voice Education and Voice Care in Teacher Training
Abstract
Kovacic’s research is very important since voice disorders are common among teachers and it is a very fascinating problem to explore. Voice disorders have an extremely bad influence on the teachers’ ability to teach in practice. The research report consists of six parts: Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Other reports and future directions, and Conclusion. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze and evaluate the method section of Kovacic’s research, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of main research approaches and techniques used by the author from the following three perspectives: sampling, research method and questionnaire materials, and then propose the effective measures to improve this research.
Keywords
Kovacic; Voice Disorders; Teachers’ Ability；
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter.
Porte, G. K. (2002). Appraising research in second language learning: a practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson, N. and McLean, S. (1994) Questionnaire design: a practical introduction. Newtown Abbey, Co. Antrim: University of Ulster Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i1.4130
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
