• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Flux and Eternity - The Mutual Interpretation of Heraclitus and Laozi’s Ontological Thought

Qingqi Yang

Abstract


Heraclitus and Lao Tzu were important representatives of Eastern and Western civilisations in the Axial Age, and they had a number of unique insights and fits on the issue of ontology. Both Heraclitus and Laozi noted the irreversible role of laws, the former taking the Logos as the basis for the existence of all things, the latter considering the Tao as the root of all things in the universe; both Heraclitus and Laozi saw that things are always in constant change, the former taking fire as the origin of the world and the cause of all changes, the latter pointing out that the Tao itself is in movement and change along with all human beings; both Heraclitus and Laozi Both Heraclitus and Laozi acknowledge the eternal nature of all things, the former focusing on the living fire and the Logos, the latter on the apprehension of and conformity to the Tao.

Keywords


Heraclitus; Laozi; Ontology; Logos; Tao

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Heraclitus. The Remnants of the Writings of Heraclitus [M]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 2007.

[2] Zhou Ying, Wei Chen-chen. Tao and Logos: A Comparison of Lao Zhuang and Heraclitus' Philosophical Thought[J]. Journal of Huabei Coal Teachers' College (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2000(4):36-40.

[3] Wang Meimei. The development of Taoist ontological thought in the pre-Qin Dynasty [J]. Journal of Chongqing Institute of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2012(9):32-33,38.

[4] Chen Guying. Translation and commentary on Laozi [M]. Beijing: China Book Bureau, 2015.

[5] Guan Ziyin. The Void of Self in order to Travel the World: An Interpretation of the Non-Natural Philosophy of Early Greek Philosophy[J]. Journal of Zhongshan University (Social Science Edition), 2010,50(4):124-150.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i3.7209

Refbacks