A Comparative Study of University Education Equity Policies in Hong Kong (China), Mainland China, and Internationally
Abstract
From a professional and technical perspective, it analyzes the current status of policies in these three regions, explores their differences and
commonalities by comparing policy-making logic, resource input efficiency, and effect evaluation dimensions. The research finds that while
the core goal of policies in all three regions is to promote education equity, their implementation paths vary. Finally, targeted optimization
strategies are proposed to provide references for enhancing the equity of university education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Zhang, Zhilin, and Bai Hua. “A Review of Policies Ensuring Equitable Higher Education Access for Disadvantaged Groups in Australia.” Journal of Higher Education in Coal Industry, 2024, 42(03): 92–100.
[2] Song, Hongxia. “Exploring Equity in Higher Education Access: A Perspective on National Policies.” Journal of Sanmenxia Polytechnic, 2024, 23(01): 123–130.
[3] Shi, Yan, and Yu Saiyue. “Policy Changes in Equity of Higher Education Access in China — Based on the Punctuated Equilibrium
Theory.” Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (01): 53–66.
[4] Wang, Zhifeng, and Wang Weiyi. “International Evolution of Higher Education Equity Policies in the Popularization Stage — From
the Perspective of Sustainable Development.” University Education Science, 2024, (01): 97–107.
[5] Li, Jun. “The Global Ranking Dictatorship and University 3.0 in China — A Comparative Case Study of Academic Evaluation in
Mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States.” Modern Education Forum, 2016, (04): 4–6.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ede.v4i3.14298
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
