A Review of Literature on Peer Review in ESL/EFL Writing
Abstract
of the popular student-centered idea. This paper focuses on peer review use in ESL/EFL writing classes. It reviews the recent papers from
three aspects: the eff ectiveness of peer review, the factors infl uencing its eff ectiveness and the necessary training for student reviewers.
Some limitations and implications are given in the fi nal part, aiming at help both teachers and students achieve better peer review eff ect and
pointing out the future research directions for the researchers in this area.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Van den Berg, Ineke & Wilfried Admiraal and Albert Pilot (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education Vol.31, No.1, Feburuary 2006, 19-36
[2] Suzuki, M. (2008). Japanese Learners’ S elf Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. Tesol Quarterly 42(2).
[3] Grace Hui Chin Lin and Paul Shih Chieh Chien (2009). An Investigation into Eff ectiveness of Peer Feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Language
Fortune Institute of Institute of Technology. June, 2009 Vol.3.
[4] Crossman, J.M. (2012). Facilitating improved writing among students through directed peer review. Active learning in higher education 13(3) 219–229
[5] Liao H. C. & Lo Y. F. (2012). Peer Review Comments Provided by High- and Low-Profi ciency L2 Learners: A Comparative Study. International Journal
of English Linguistics 2(5)
[6] Yu, S. L. & Lee, I. (2014). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory
perspective. Language Teaching Research, 1–22
[7] Foley, S. (2013). Student views of peer assessment at the International School of Lausanne. Journal of Research in International Education 12(3) 201–213
[8] Hu, G.W. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research 9,3 (2005); pp. 321–342
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ede.v1i10.5837
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
