• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Higher Education Forum

Measurement and Pedagogical Application of Group Cohesion in Cooperative Learning of College English Teaching

Fangzhuo Lyu

Abstract


Cooperative learning highlights students’ co-construction of knowledge through interaction, with group cohesion recognised as a
critical indicator of its effectiveness. This paper reviews the theoretical foundations of cohesion and introduces sociometric methods for its
measurement, focusing on indices of interpersonal status, cohesiveness, and dispersion. Pedagogically, cohesion measurement informs group
formation, task allocation, and instructional interventions, supporting sustained cooperation and effective language use. The study highlights
cohesion as both an analytical and pedagogical tool, contributing to the improvement of learners’ language proficiency, teamwork skills, and
confidence in communication.

Keywords


Cooperative Learning; Group Cohesion; College English Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1]Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Cooperative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier.

[2]Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[3]Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (2005). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 47(3), 394-403.

[4]Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[5]Gao, Y. (2013). A Study of the Positive Effects of Information-gap Tasks in SSA. Foreign Languages and Literature, (6), 153-157.

[6]Garrison, D. R. (2007). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.

[7]Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.

[8]Huang, R. H. (2003). Computer-supported cooperative learning: Theory and methods. People’s Education Press.

[9]Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC

Higher Education Report No. 4. George Washington University.

[10]Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the

Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.

[11]Li, C. G. (2013). Study on the Application of Multimode Learning Environment Based on Internet to the College English Teaching

for Music, Sports and Arts Majors. Foreign Language Education through Technology, (5), 71-75.

[12]Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease

Publishing.

[13]Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

[14]Tang, Y. B., & Wei, X. H. (2009). Cultivating college students’ teamwork ability through cooperative English education. Journal of

Chengdu Textile College, (7), 57-60.

[15]Tong, H., & Yang, Y. J. (2016). Study on the cooperative knowledge building communities in blended learning. Modern Distance

Education, 02, 56-62.

[16]Zhou, X. H. (1991). Modern social psychology: A comprehensive exploration from sociological, psychological, and cultural anthropological perspectives. Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/hef.v4i2.14234

Refbacks