Effect of conventional driving experience on trust in autonomous vehicles (L2 and 3): A review
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Self-driving vehicle: Who is liable if the vehicle crashes? Available online: https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicles-safety#:~:text=It%20is%20vital%20to%20emphasize,the%20consumer%20available%20technologies%20today (accessed on 18 August 2023).
Brandenburg S, Skottke EM. Switching from manual to automated driving and reverse: Are drivers behaving more risky after highly automated driving? In: Proceedings of the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC); 8–11 October 2014; Qingdao, China. pp. 2978–2983.
World Economic Forum. Cars still dominate the American commute. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/05/commute-america-sustainability-cars/ (accessed on 23 August 2023).
Rasmussen J. Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1983; SMC-13(3): 257–266. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
Blanco M, Atwood J, Vasquez HM, et al. Human Factors Evaluation of Level 2 and Level 3 Automated Driving Concepts. The U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2015.
Tsai JAH, Juang JC, Tu CH, et al. Development of key technologies for autonomous driving vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International Automatic Control Conference (CACS); 13–16 November 2019; Keelung, Taiwan. pp. 1–6.
SAE International. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/ (accessed on 18 August 2023).
Endsley MR. Situation awareness in future autonomous vehicles: Beware of the unexpected. In: Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S (editors). Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018); 26–30 August 2018; Florence, Italy. Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 303–309.
Gruel W, Stanford JM. Assessing the long-term effects of autonomous vehicles: A speculative approach. Transportation Research Procedure 2016; 13: 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.003
Anna P, Ida K. Effects of driverless vehicles: Comparing simulations to get a broader picture. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2019; 19(1): 1–23.
Shariff A, Bonnefon JF, Rahwan I. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour 2017; 1(10): 694–696. doi: 10.1038/ s41562-017-0202-6
Xu Z, Zhang K, Min H, et al. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transp. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2018; 95: 320–334. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
Avetisian L, Ayoub J, Zhou F. Anticipated emotions associated with trust in autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2022; 66(1): 199–203. doi: 10.1177/1071181322661002
Hsieh S, Wang AR, Madison A, et al. Adaptive driving assistant model (ADAM) for advising drivers of autonomous vehicles. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2022; 12(3): 1–28. doi: 10.1145/3545994
Rödel C, Stadler S, Meschtscherjakov A, Tscheligi M. Towards autonomous cars: The effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 17–19 September 2014; Seattle, WA, USA. pp. 1–8.
Deloitte. 2019 Deloitte global automotive consumer study: Advanced vehicle technologies and multimodal transportation. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/manufacturing/us-global-automotive-consumer-study-2019.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2023).
Lee J, Abe G, Sato K, Itoh M. Preliminary investigation of system transparency and system failure on driver trust in partial vehicle automation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 10–14 October 2022; Atlanta, GA, US. pp. 1091–1091.
NHTSA. Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Available online: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/automated_vehicles_policy.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2023).
Reagan IJ, Cicchino JB, Teoh ER, et al. Behavior change over time when driving with adaptive cruise control. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 10–14 October 2022; Atlanta, Georgia, USA. pp. 352–356.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews 2015; 4(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Manchon JB, Bueno M, Navarro J. From manual to automated driving: How does trust evolve? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2021; 22(5): 528–554. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2020.1830450
Ma Z, Zhang Y. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2021; 159: 106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238
Walch M, Lange K, Baumann M, Weber M. Autonomous driving: Investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications; 1–3 September 2015; Nottingham, United Kingdom. pp. 11–18.
Hulse LM, Xie H, Galea ER. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender, and age. Safety Science 2018; 102: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
Atkinson D, Hancock P, Hoffman RR, et al. Trust in computers and robots: The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2012; 56(1): 303–307. doi: 10.1177/1071181312561071
Hewitt C, Politis I, Amanatidis T, Sarkar A. Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces; 17–20 March 2019; Marina del Ray, California, USA. pp. 518–527.
Huff EW, DellaMaria N, Posadas B, Brinkley J. Am I too old to drive?: Opinions of older adults on self-driving vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 28–30 October 2019; Pittsburgh, PA, USA. pp. 200–509.
Marottoli RA, Richardson ED. Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1998; 30(3): 331–336. doi: 10.1016/S00014575(97)00100-0
McCall R, McGee F, Meschtscherjakov A, et al. Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 24–26 October 2016; Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 193–200.
Molnar LJ, Pradhan AK, Eby DW, et al. Age-Related Differences in Driver Behavior Associated with Automated Vehicles and the Transfer of Control between Automated and Manual Control: A Simulator Evaluation. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2017.
Schoettle B, Sivak M. Motorists’ Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2015.
Puertas-Ramirez D, Serrano-Mamolar A, Gomez DM, Boticario JG. Should conditional self-driving cars consider the state of the human inside the vehicle? In: Proceedings of the Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization; 21–25 June 2021; Utrecht, Netherlands. pp. 137–141.
Borenstein J, Herkert JR, Miller KW. Self-driving cars and engineering ethics: The need for system-level analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics 2019; 25(2): 383–398. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0
Moor R. What happens to American myth when you take the driver out of it? The self-driving car and the future of the self. Available online: http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/10/is-the-self-driving-car-un-american.html (accessed on 18 August 2023).
Ma RHY, Morris A, Herriotts P, Birrell S. Investigating what level of visual information inspires trust in a user of a highly automated vehicle. Applied Ergonomics 2021; 90: 103272. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103272
Brell T, Philipsen R, Ziefle M. sCARy! Risk perceptions in autonomous driving: The influence of experience on perceived benefits and barriers. Risk Analysis 2019; 39(2): 342–357. doi: 10.1111/ risa.13190
Ucińska M, Odachowska E, GąsioreK, Kruszewski M. Age and experience in driving a vehicle and psychomotor skills in the context of automation. Open Engineering 2021; 11(1): 453–462. doi: 10.1515/eng-2021-0045
Lu G, Zhai J, Li P, et al. Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2021; 82: 96–110. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.005
Hoff KA, Bashir M. Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors 2015; 57(3): 407–434. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570
Koo J, Kwac J, Ju W, et al. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2015; 9: 269–275. doi: 10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2
Ma R, Kaber DB. Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2005; 35(10): 939–953. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002
Endsley MR. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference; 23–27 May 1988; Dayton, OH, USA. pp. 789–795.
Gable TM, Walker BN, Moses HR, et al. Advanced auditory cues on mobile phones help keep drivers’ eyes on the road. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 28–30 October 2013; Eindhoven, Netherlands. pp. 66–73.
Feldhütter A, Gold C, Schneider S, Bengler K. How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. In: Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products, and Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2016. pp. 309–318.
Greenlee ET, DeLucia PR, Newton DC. Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: Hazard detection failures are a matter of time. Human Factors 2018; 60(4): 465–476. doi: 10.1177/0018720818761711
Jarosch O, Bengler K. Is It the duration of the ride or the non-driving related task? What affects take-over performance in conditional automated driving? In: Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S (editors). Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Proceedings of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; 26–30 August 2018; Florence, Italy. Springer, Cham; 2018. Volume 823, pp. 512–523.
Nilsson J, Falcone P, Vinter J. Safe transitions from automated to manual driving using driver controllability estimation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2015; 16: 1806–1816. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2376877
Ayoub J, Zhou F, Bao S, Yang XJ. From manual driving to automated driving: A review of 10 years of AutoUI. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 21–25 September 2019; Utrecht, Netherlands. pp. 70–90.
Eriksson A, Stanton NA. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors 2017; 59(4): 689–705. doi: 10.1177/0018720816685832
Politis I, Brewster S, Pollick K. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 1–3 September 2015; Nottingham, United Kingdom. pp. 3–10.
Large DR, Burnett G, Anyasodo B, Skrypchuk L. Assessing cognitive demand during natural language interactions with a digital driving assistant. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 24–26 October 2016; Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 67–74.
Vongvit R, Lee J, Itoh M, Lee SC. Meta-trend of trust factors in autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 17–20 September 2022; Seoul, Republic of Korea. pp. 94–98.
Petersen L, Robert L, Yang XJ, Tilbury D. Situational awareness, drivers trust in automated driving systems and secondary task performance. SAE International Journal of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles, Forthcoming 2019; 2(2): 2019. doi: 10.4271/12-02-02-0009
Trösterer S, Gärtner M, Mirnig A, et al. You never forget how to drive: Driver skilling and deskilling in the advent of autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 24–26 October 2016; New York, NY, USA. pp. 209–216.
Puertas-Ramirez D, Serrano-Mamolar A, Gomez DM, Boticario JG. 2021. Should conditional self-driving cars consider the state of the human inside the vehicle? In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization; 21–25 June 2021; Utrecht, Netherlands. pp. 137–141.
Meschtscherjakov A, Tscheligi M, Pfleging B, et al. Interacting with autonomous vehicles: Learning from other domains. In: Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 21–26 April 2018; Montreal, QC, Canada. pp. 1–8.
Choi JK, Ji YG. Investigating the importance of trust in adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2015; 31(10): 692–702. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
Niculescu AI, Dix A, Yeo KH. Are you ready for a drive?: User perspectives on autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 6–11 May 2017; Denver, Colorado, USA. pp. 2810–2817.
Raats K, Fors V, Pink S. Understanding trust in automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction; 2–5 December 2019; Fremantle, WA, Australia. pp. 352–358.
Gold C, Körber M, Hohenberger C, et al. Trust in automation—Before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing 2015; 3: 3025–3032. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847
Hartwich F, Witzlack C, Beggiato M, Krems JF. The first impression counts—A combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviors 2019; 65: 522–535. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012
Schwarz C, Gaspar J, Brown T. The effect of reliability on drivers’ trust and behavior in conditional automation. Cognition, Technology & Work 2019; 21(1): 41–54. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0522-y
Jin M, Lu G, Chen F, Shi X. How driving experience affect trust in automation from level 3 automated vehicles? An experimental analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC); 20–23 September 2020; Rhodes, Greece. pp. 1–6.
Payre W, Cestac J, Dang NT, et al. Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2017; 46: 216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.02.001
Faltaous S, Baumann M, Schneegass S, Chuang LL. Design guidelines for reliability communication in autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications; 23–25 September 2018; Toronto, Canada. pp. 258–267.
Greenlee ET, DeLucia PR, Newton DC. Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: Hazard detection failures are a matter of time. Human Factors 2018; 60(4): 465–476. doi: 10.1177/0018720818761711
Lee J, Lee D, Park Y, et al. Autonomous vehicles can be shared, but a feeling of ownership is important: An examination of the influential factors for intention to use autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2019; 107: 411–422. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.020
Stephen S. Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 2018; 22(3): 190–200. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2017.1336053
Lewandowsky S, Mundy M, Tan GB. The dynamics of trust: Comparing humans to automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2000; 6(2): 104–123. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.2.104
Hulse LM, Xie H, Galea ER. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science 2018; 102: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2016 Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. (Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 456). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2017.
Hansson SO, Belin MÅ, Lundgren B. Self-driving vehicles—An ethical overview. Philosophy and Technology 2021; 34: 1383–1408. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00464-5
Koo J, Shin D, Steinert M, Leifer L. Understanding driver responses to voice alerts of autonomous car operations. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2016; 70(4): 377–392. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2016.076740
Ma Z, Zhang Y. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2021; 159: 106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238
Khastgir S, Birrell SA, Dhadyalla G, Jennings P. Calibrating trust through knowledge: Introducing the concept of informed safety for automation in vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2018; 96: 290–303. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.001
Wang C, Steeghs S, Chakraborty D, et al. Designing for enhancing situational awareness of semi-autonomous driving vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular; 24–27 September 2017; Oldenburg, Germany. pp. 228–229.
Lee JD, Moray N. Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1994; 40(1): 153–184. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007
Ebnali M, Hulme K, Ebnali-Heidari A, Mazloumi A. How does training effect users’ attitudes and skills needed for highly automated driving? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2019; 66: 184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.001
Bueno M, Dogan E, Selem FH, et al. How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC); 1–4 November 2016; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. pp. 2040–2045.
Merat N, Jamson A, Frank C, et al. Transition to manual: Driver behavior when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2014; 27: 274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
Hegner SM, Beldad AD, Brunswick GJ. In automatic we trust: Investigating the impact of trust, control, personality characteristics, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2019; 35(19): 1769–1780. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/mt.v12i1.9293
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
