Connotation Evolution and Relationship Identification of Risk Governance, Crisis Governance, Disaster Governance and Emergency Governance
Abstract
dialogue and disciplinary knowledge production. This paper explores in depth the process of constructing the concepts of risk governance,
crisis governance, disaster governance and emergency governance, and clarifi es the evolution of the connotations and interrelationships of
these concepts. The study concludes that although the concepts have the connection of maternal isomorphism and mutual reinforcement,
there are still diff erences between governance objects and objectives.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] ZHOU L-min, TONG Xing: Disaster Response 2.0: Disaster Governance in the Big Data Age Case Study of Practice of Yangjiang [J]. China Soft Science,
2019(10):1-13.
[2] ZENG Xiancai: Risk, Individualization and Sub-politics: The Social State and Risk Response Under the Beck’s Theory of Risk Society [J]. Social Policy
Research, 2021(03):108-121.
[3] WANG Hongwei: Reform of Public Crisis Management Mode in the Perspective of Holistic Approach to National Security [J]. Administrative Tribune,
2018,25(04):18-24.
[4] WanQiang Xu, Ting Zhang: The Role Review and Embedding Path of Social Organizations in Public Crisis Governance [J]. Journal of Zhengzhou
University, 2021,54(06):14-19.
[5] Wang Yanqing, Chen Hong: Evolution of Emergency Management Theory and Practice: Dilemma and Prospect [J]. Management Review,
2022,34(05):290-303.
[6] Cai Xiaobin: Modernization of Social Governance in the New Era: Governance Types, Framework Construction and Policy Approaches [J].
Macroeconomics, 2021(06):124-132.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v7i12.11838
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
