Research on operation status and improvement strategy of Meishan Medical Dispute People’s Mediation Committee
Abstract
in solving medical disputes. Taking Meishan People’s Mediation Committee for medical disputes as an example, this paper expounds
its operation status and existing problems, and puts forward the need to improve the medical risk sharing mechanism, strengthen the
professionalism of people’s mediation for medical disputes, broaden the funding guarantee channels, and improve credibility and
independence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Chen Jiayi. On “The restart of Medical Dispute Mediation Procedure” from the perspective of Social governance [J]. Medicine and Law,202,14(3):72-76. (in
Chinese)
[2] Lin Xiaoxin, Lin Peijun, Pan Jiasheng. [J]. Inspiration from the Third Party mediation Model of Medical Disputes abroad to People’s Mediation of
Medical disputes in China. Chinese Medical Ethics,2017,30(10):1223-1227.
[3] Wang Yue-qiang, Zhang Ming-wen. A brief discussion on the status quo, problems and countermeasures of People’s Mediation of medical disputes in
Shanghai [J]. Law and Society,2019(6):139-141.
[4] Zhang Xudong, Tian Tian, Yi Xuf. Comparison of domestic and foreign medical dispute resolution mechanisms [J]. Journal of Forensic
Medicine,202,38(2):150-157. (in Chinese)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v8i8.13789
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.