• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Why Cities Appear to Fail under Economic Globalization? Taking Detroit as an Example

Yifan Cai

Abstract


In the era of economic globalization, cities across the globe show very different economic development profiles. While a number of cities have enjoyed the benefits of global economic connections, Detroit’s economy shrunk sharply. Why would that happen? First, this article investigates how industrial re-orientation under global change impacts Detroit’s economic development. Next, this article focuses on the diversity of industries and how it influences Detroit’s urban growth through mechanisms of agglomeration economy. Then, this article points out the importance of human capital and how place-based strategy instead of people-based strategy influence Detroit negatively. Finally, this article explores further about social environment in Detroit that harms its economic performance. In conclusion, this article asserts that urban re-orientation in the global production network, diversity of industries, human capitals, social environment, and politically radical actions constitute Detroit’s failure, with human capitals as the most prominent factor.

Keywords


International Political Economy; Development Strategy; Detroit

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boston Planning and Development Agency. 2020. Boston's Economy. [Online]. [Accessed 22, March 2021]. Available: http:// www.bostonplans.org/research-publications.

Duranton, G. and Puga, D. 2001. Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products. The American economic review. 91(5), pp.1454-1477.

Gibbons, S. 2017. Planes, Trains and Automobiles: The Economic Impact of Transport Infrastructure. SERC Policy Paper 13.

Glaeser, E. L. 2003. Mother of Reinvention. [Accessed 22 March 2021]. [Online].Available:https:// economyleague. org/uploads/ files/122997552711640827-mother-of-reinvention-how-boston-s-economy-has-bounced-back-from-decline-time-and-aga in.pdf.

Glaeser, E. L. 2012. Triumph of the city. London: Pan.

Helsley, R. and Strange, W. 1990. Matching and Agglomeration Economics in a Sytem of Cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 20, pp.223-248.

Huggins, R. 2016. Capital, institutions and urban growth systems. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society. 9(2), pp.443-463.

Koven, S. G., Koven, A. C., Taylor and Francis, G. 2018. Growth, decline, and regeneration in large cities: a case study approach. New York: Routledge.

Melo. P.C., Graham, D.J. and Brage-Ardao, R. 2013. The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 43(5), pp.695-706.

Nathan, B. and John, G. 2013. How Detroit went broke: The answers may surprise you — and don't blame Coleman Young. [Online]. Detroit Free Press. [Accessed 22 March 2021]. Available: https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2013/09/15/how-detroit-went-broke-the-answers-may-surprise-you-and/77152028/

Puga, D. and Duranton, G. 2003. Micro-foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies. NBER Working Paper 9931.

Scott, A. J. and Storper, M. 2015. The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory. International journal of urban and regional research. 39(1), pp.1-15.

Storper, M. 2010. Why Does a City Grow? Specialisation, Human Capital or Institutions?. Urban Studies. 47(10), pp.2027–2050.

Storper, M. 2013. Keys to the City: how economics, institutions, social interactions,and politics shape development. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Chapter 1.

Retooling for Growth: Building a 21st Century Economy in America's Older Industrial Areas. Washington DC: Brookings.

Yeung, H. 2009. Transnational Corporations, Global Production Networks, and Urban and Regional Development: A Geographer's Perspective on Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Growth and Change. 40(2), pp.197-226.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/mmf.v6i2.4144

Refbacks