• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Analysis of Tangible Rewards in Incentive Schemes

Hanxi Yang

Abstract


This report explains why sales employees treat tangible rewards differently from cash rewards and how tangible rewards motivate sales employees to attain better performance based on relevant theories and experiments. Five main explanations are given. Firstly, employees perceive cash rewards as “more salary” and treat tangible rewards separately from cash earnings. Consequently, tangible rewards are perceived more valuable. Secondly, the hedonic nature and an ambiguity in value lead to an increase in perceived value of tangible rewards. Thirdly, tangible rewards better convey employers’ recognition and appreciation of employees’ good performance and therefore are perceived more memorable and valuable. Fourthly, employees find it is easier to justify hedonic purchases if the hedonic goods are earned as tangible rewards. Accordingly, tangible rewards are more attractive. Lastly, poor-performing sales employees tend to be more optimistic when eligible for tangible rewards and exert more effort.
Based on the findings, the report also gives some recommendation on using tangible rewards to motivate employees:
To consider the income level of employees
To ensure tangible rewards are of hedonic nature
To implement some tournaments schemes if applicable
To communicate recognition and appreciation through tangible rewards

Keywords


Tangible Rewards; Cash Rewards; Incentive Schemes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225-241.

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrin- sic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008. doi:10.1037/ a0035661

Choi, W., & Presslee, A. (2016, March). The performance effects of tangible versus cash rewards: The mediating role of categorization. AAA.

Gagné, M., & Forest, J. (2008). The study of compensation systems through the lens of self-determination theory: Reconciling 35 years of debate. Canadian Psychology/ Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 225-232. doi:10.1037/a0012757

Harin, A. (2006). A Rational Irrational Man?.

Helion, C., and T. Gilovich. (2014). Gift cards and mental accounting: Green-lighting hedonic spending. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 27 (4): 386–393.

Hur, J. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2016). Paying for performance: Performance incentives increase desire for the reward object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 301-316.

Jeffrey, S., & Shaffer, V. (2007). The motivational properties of tangible incentives. Compensation & Benefits Review, 39(3), 44-50.

Kelly, K., Presslee, A., & Webb, A. (2019). Motivating employees with gift cards. Retrieved from https://sfmagazine.com/post-entry/august-2019-motivating-employees-with-gift-cards/

Moller, A. C., & Deci, E. L. (2014). The psychology of getting paid: An integrated perspective. In E. Bijleveld & H. Aarts (Eds.), The psychological science of money (pp. 137-162). New York, NY: Springer

Rottenstreich, Y., and C. Hsee. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science 12 (3): 185–190. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00334

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self- determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214

Viswanathan, M., Li, X., John, G., & Narasimhan, O. (2018). Is cash king for sales compensation plans? Evidence from a large-scale field intervention. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 368-381.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/mmf.v6i2.4267

Refbacks