An eye-movement study of the parafoveal preview effect from words n+2 in Tibetan reading
Abstract
fixated words, but also extract information from the words that have not been fixed at on the right side of the fixated words for word
recognition, which is called the parafoveal preview eff ect. The relevant studies using the boundary paradigm to examine the preview eff ect
show that readers can obtain font, phonetic and semantic preview information from the parafoveal word n+1 in both alphabetic and Chinese
reading. However, the results of the research on n+2 preview eff ect of the parafoveal words are not consistent, which provides evidence
for the existence of n+2 preview eff ect in Chinese reading, while the results of the research on alphabetic characters are still controversial.
Therefore, as far as the present is concerned, there is no consistent result in the research on the preview eff ect of the word n+2. Tibetan is a
special language, which has the characteristics of both alphabetic and ideographic characters. A study of the preview eff ect of the parafoveal
words n+2 in Tibetan reading can further investigate whether the prediction of eye movement control model is correct in the reading process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Rayner K, Inhoff A W, Morrison R E, et al. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fi xations in reading.[J]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept
Perform, 1981, 7(1):167-179.
[2] Rayner K, and, et al. Integrating information across eye movements - ScienceDirect[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1980, 12(2):206-226.
[3]Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7(1):65-81.
[4] Rayner K, Juhasz B J, Brown S J. Do readers obtain preview benefi t from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing
models of eye movement control in reading.[J]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2007, 33(1):230-245.
[5] Angele B, Slattery T J, Yang J , et al. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously[J]. Vis Cogn, 2008, 16(6):697-
707.
[6] Angele B, Rayner K. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human
Perception & Performance, 2011, 37(4):1210.
[7] Vasilev M R, Angele B. Parafoveal preview eff ects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis[J].
Psychon Bull Rev, 2017, 24(3):666-689.
[8]Kliegl R, Risse S, Laubrock J. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.[J]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2007,
33(5):1250-1255.
[9] Risse S, Engbert R, Kliegl R. Eye-movement control in reading : experimental and corpus-analysis challenges for a computational model. 2008.
[10] Radach R, Inhoff A W, Glover L, et al. Contextual constraint and N+2 preview eff ects in reading.[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
2013, 66(3):619-633.
[12] Risse S, Hohenstein S, Kliegl R , et al. A theoretical analysis of the perceptual span based on SWIFT simulations of the n + 2 boundary paradigm[J].
Visual Cognition, 2014, 22(3-4):283-308.
[13] Schotter E R, Reichle E D, Rayner K. Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefi t and
N+2 preview eff ects[J]. Visual Cognition, 2014, 22(3-4):309-333.
[14] Yang J, Wang S, Xu Y , et al. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefi t from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 2009, 35(4):1192.
[15] Hu Qianqian. An eye movement study on the preview eff ect of Chinese reading words n+2 [D]. Zhengzhou University, 2017
[16] Xuejun Bai, Yongsheng Wang, Zhiying Guo, et al. An eye movement study on the infl uence of the preview of words N+2 in Chinese reading on the
processing of high-frequency words N+1 [J]. Journal of Psychology, 2015, 47 (2): 143-156
[17] Wang Yongsheng, Chen Mingjing, Zhao Bingjie, et al. The role of sub central concave characters N+1 and N+2 in saccade target selection [J].
Psychological and Behavioral Research, 2017, 15 (6): 10
[18] Schotter E R, Angele B, Rayner K. Parafoveal processing in reading[J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012. 18
[19] Reichle E D, Pollatsek A, Fisher D L, et al. Toward a Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading[J]. Psychological Review, 1998, 105(1):125-157. 19
[20] Engbert R, Nuthmann A, Richter E M, et al. SWIFT: A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation During Reading[J]. Psychological Review, 2005,
112(4):777-813.
[21] Xuejun Bai, Xiaolei Gao, Lei Gao, et al. An eye movement study on the perceptual breadth of Tibetan reading [J]. Journal of Psychology, 2017, 49 (5): 8
[22] Xiaolei Gao, Xiaowei Li, Min Sun, et al. The word frequency eff ect of the central fovea and its infl uence on the preview eff ect of the sub central fovea in
Tibetan reading [J]. Journal of Psychology, 2020, 52 (10): 13
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v6i10.5870
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
