A Study on the Krashen's “Affective Filter Hypothesis” in English Teaching
Abstract
aspects: teaching and learning. From the perspective of student acquisition, American linguist Krashen (1981) proposed a complete set of
second language acquisition models, which provided reference for foreign language teaching. Its theory is based on fi ve hypotheses: input,
emotional fi ltering, acquisition mechanism and output. Among them, the aff ective fi lter hypothesis was originally proposed by Dulay and
Burt, mainly to explain the infl uence of aff ective factors on foreign language learning. Krashen developed this theory, which he described as
many aff ective variables as possible that contribute to second language acquisition. Teachers can take various teaching methods to reduce the
emotional fi lters of students in teaching, just like making visitors feel ease at home, so as to maximize students’ enthusiasm for learning and
improve teaching eff ects.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1]Wang Min. Teaching strategies of oral English for college students from the perspective of second language acquisition theory [J]. Journal of Shanxi
Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2015, 42(S1): 234-235.
[2] Meng Chunguo. (2004). Deconstruction and reconstruction of Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis. Journal of Tianjin University of Foreign
Languages(03), 73-76.
[3] Xue Rong. (2005). “Emotional Filter Hypothesis” and its application in foreign language classroom teaching. Journal of Pingyuan University (02), 106-
109.
[4] Wang Yanling. (2010). Research on the current situation and countermeasures of English teaching for art students in colleges and universities. Journal of
Huanggang Vocational and Technical College (03), 52-55.
[5] Sun Lin & Li Xiangqun. (2006). Give full play to the main role of students and improve college English teaching—Thinking about English teaching for
art students. Journal of Liaoning Administration Institute (02), 98-99.
[6] Zhao Qishun. (2011). On the current situation and teaching strategies of college English learning for art students in colleges and universities. Journal of
Yili Normal University (Social Science Edition) (02), 123-125.
[7] Wang Wenbin. On the Relationship between Linguistics and Foreign Language Education Research [J]. Foreign Language Teaching, 2022, 43(02): 1-9.
[8] Xue Rong. “Emotional Filtering Hypothesis” and its application in foreign language classroom teaching [J]. Journal of Pingyuan University, 2005(02):106-
109.
[9] Xiong Xiaochun, Yang Qingyu. On the Application of “Language Input Hypothesis” and “Emotion Filter Hypothesis” in English Teaching [J]. China
Adult Education, 2014(13): 155-158.
[10] Jin Ying. An Analysis of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Cognitive Research on Second Language Acquisition [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural
University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 15(02): 93-96.
[11] Wang Jing. A Review of Krashen’s “Emotional Filtering Hypothesis” [J]. Anhui Literature (Second Half Month), 2008(09):313-314.
[12] Wu Jie. The signifi cance of Krashen’s second language acquisition theory to foreign language teaching in my country [J]. Higher Education Forum,
2003(02):175-177.
[13] Wang Baisong. The infl uence of Krashen’s second language acquisition theory on bilingual teaching [J]. Theory and Modernization, 2015(04):113-117.
[14] Ren Ruyi. The influence of Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis on second language acquisition [J]. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature,
2007(19):54-57.
[15] Xiong Jie. Krashen’s Commentary on the “Input Hypothesis” [J]. Anhui Literature (Second Half Month), 2009(11):220-221.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v6i12.6941
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
