Research on Classifi ed Framework of Undergraduate Engineering Education Based on The Perspective of Talent Cultivation
Abstract
talents has undergone profound changes, while the homogeneity of higher education tends to be serious, and the structural contradictions
are more prominent. Based on the perspective of talent cultivation, taking undergraduate engineering education as the foothold, and taking
talent classifi cation as the theoretical basis for the classifi cation of higher education, this paper clarifi es the classifi cation framework of
academic, applied and vocational undergraduate engineering education, which provides favorable conditions for the reform of diff erent types
of engineering education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Liu Xiaoyu. The characteristics and trend of higher education internationalization in the era of “limited globalization” and the path choice of Chinese
universities [J] Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 2022, 40 (8): 7.
[2] Xu Jianhua, Li Ji. Analysis of the supply-side structure reform of higher vocational education in the context of the new economic normal [J] China Adult
Education, 2019 (13): 3.
[3] Chen Guolong, Lin Suchuan. Deepen the “four in one” transformation and reform and build an applied university running system [J] China Higher
Education, 2017 (22): 4.
[4] Diao Yuhua. Analysis of the high-quality development path of higher education in the popularization stage [J] China Higher Education, 2021 (2): 3.
[5] H. R. Bowen, Fincher C. Is Higher Education Worth the Cost? : The Individual and Social Value of American Higher Education[M]. two thousand and
eighteen, 2018.
[6] Maluting. The structural system of higher education in the new era [J] China Higher Education Research, 2021 (9): 7.
[7] Huisman J. The emergence of the higher education research field (1976–2018): preferential attachment, smallworldness and fragmentation in its
collaboration networks[J]. Higher Education, 2020:1-17.
[8] Li Xingguo, Zhao Xiaodong. Statistical test of the correlation and stability of the evaluation system of Chinese universities [J] Statistics and Decision
Making, 2018 (23): 3.
[9] Xu Xiangyun, Zhang Qian. Looking at the construction of fi rst-class undergraduate majors from the perspective of the coexistence of undergraduate and
graduate education -- a study based on the classifi ed data of Carnegie universities in 2018 [J] China Higher Education Research, 2020 (7): 7.
[10] Li Zhiyi. Key points for design and implementation of the new round of audit and evaluation scheme [J] Higher Engineering Education Research, 2021 (3):
7.
[11] Huang Haiyang, Qin Jinyi. More open, more independent and more incentive - the fi rst instance of the Shanghai Higher Education Promotion Regulations
(Draft) [J] Shanghai People’s Congress Monthly, 2017 (9): 2.
[12] Gu Yong’an. The era of “specialty is king”: how to deal with it in colleges and universities [J] Research on Education Development, 2018, 38 (19): 3.
[13] Liu Siyuan. Professional certifi cation and curriculum content construction of engineering education: practical demands, standards and mechanisms [J]
Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 2021, 39 (7): 5.
[14] Feng Yaqing, Zhang Fengbao, Xia Shuqian. Establish national standards for teaching quality of chemical engineering majors and improve the quality of
chemical talents training [J] China University Teaching, 2018 (1): 3.
[15] Meng Ruizhen. Research on the reform and practice of market-oriented digital course of modern logistics foundation [J] Modern Marketing: Information
Edition, 2019 (3): 2.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v7i4.7983
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
