Construction and practice of mixed teaching effect evaluation 
system in Colleges and Universities

Leina Zhao; Dongpei Zhang

doi:10.18686/modern-management-forum.v7i4.8027

Construction and practice of mixed teaching effect evaluation system in Colleges and Universities

Leina Zhao, Dongpei Zhang

Abstract

with the rapid rise of blended teaching, how to measure the eff ect of blended teaching has become a key issue for teachers.
This paper constructs a hybrid teaching eff ect evaluation system. Firstly, the principal component analysis is used to reduce the dimension of
the existing learning data set, and the teaching eff ect evaluation indexes are selected. Then, the K-means cluster analysis is used to evaluate
the teaching eff ect. The samples are divided into four categories: excellent, good, medium and poorMahalanobis classifi cation model and
Fisher criterion discrimination model put forward a joint judgment criterion to predict and classify students’ fi nal exam scores, and fi nally
give personalized information prompts or learning warnings to diff erent types of students. The teaching evaluation system proposed in this
paper is highly targeted and can be widely used in the teaching process of College Students’ performance analysis, evaluation and prediction,
which has certain reference value and practical signifi cance.

Keywords

Blended teaching; K-means clustering analysis; Evaluation system

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Xiaodong Li,Jingyue Huang,Chunxiao Cai Construction and practice of evaluation system for hybrid teaching mode of circuit experiment [j]Science and

technology horizon, 2020 (6): 3

[2] Fupeng Tian,Daoli Jiao Practice and exploration of mixed teaching mode in Colleges and Universities under the information environment [j]Research on

audio visual education2005 (4): 63-65

[3] Weiwen Huang,Hongying Xu Construction of mixed teaching evaluation index system in Higher Vocational Colleges [j]2020. (36): 69

[4] Yinghong Luo, Construction and practice of mixed teaching mode in Colleges and universities [j]Exploration of higher education, 2019 (12): 48-55

[5] Garrison D R. online community of inquiry review:social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues [j]Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 2007 (1):

61-72

[6] Garrison D R, Cleveland Innes m, Fung t S. exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence:student perceptions of the

community of inquiry framework[j]Internet & higher education, 2010 (1-2): 31-36

[7] Xin Li Research on the teaching quality evaluation system of flipped classroom -- using CDIO teaching mode evaluation standard for reference [j]

Research on audio visual education, 2015,36 (03): 96-100

[8] Chengyan Li,Jun Gao,Yuanxin Tang, etal Research on fl ipped classroom teaching evaluation system [j]Computer education2015 (11): 100-103

[9] Kaiquan Zhou Comprehensive evaluation of mixed teaching learning eff ect based on data mining [j]China education technology equipment, 2019, (22):

57-59

[10] Maozhu Yin Early warning analysis of College Students’ academic performance based on big data [d]Tianjin University of Commerce, 2018

[11] Yan Yan, College English learner assessment under blended learning mode [d], 2008, Southeast University

[12] Liangliang Wu, Research on the construction and application of University blended teaching evaluation index system [d]Pedagogy educational

technology.2020

[13] Fengqing Li,Xiaoling Han, Construction and practice of hybrid teaching quality evaluation system [j]China audio visual education, 2017 (11): 108-113

[14] Janelle M. Bailey, Janelle M. baileyExperiencing conceptual change about teaching: a case study from astrology[j], 2012542-551

[15] Afzaal Ali, Muhammad I. ramay & mudasar shahzaKey factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: a study of Allama IQ

BAL open university[j], contemporary educational technology 2011.2 (2), 118-134

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/modern-management-forum.v7i4.8027

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.