Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Behaviour—— Family Enterprises and Non-Family Enterprises
Abstract
With public awareness of social responsibility increasing recent years, corporate social responsibility has become the focus of public attention. In recent years, the research on social responsibility behaviour of family enterprises and non-family enterprises has attracted extensive attention and research interest from scholars and enterprises. This paper takes the listed companies in China's a-share market from 2015 to 2017 as the sample to empirically study whether there are practical differences between the two. The results show that family firms are superior to non-family firms in CSR practice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amann, B., Jaussaud, J., & Martinez, I. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in Japan: Family and nonfamily business differences and determinants. Asian Business & Management, 11(3), 329-345.
Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust, in Harvard Law Review, 44. Friedman, M. (1970). September 13. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 33, 126.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Huang, Y. C., Ding, H. B., & Kao, M. R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 309-326.
Su, Q., & Zhu, W. (2003). Family Control and enterprise value of listed companies. Economic studies, 8, 36-45.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of management review, 16(4), 691-718.
Zhou, C. & Yang, Y. (2010). Confucian Businessmen and their Spirit in history. Studies of China's Economic history, (4), 152-158.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/mmf.v6i9.9965
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
