• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Perceptions, Motivation, and Self-perceived Translational Skill Development in a Blended Translation Course through Peer Assessment

Jiawen Yu, Sheiladevi Sukumaran, Xinxiang Gao, Hongying Li, Yidan Hu

Abstract


Peer assessment (PA) has long been a prominent educational tool in higher education. However, there is limited evidence regarding
technology-facilitated PA in Translation studies. This study addresses this gap by examining students’ perceptions and motivation toward a
five-week online PA activity in a Translation course. It further explores the correlation between students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
and their perceived skill enhancement. Thirty-six third-year students participated, responding to Likert-type scale questionnaires. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used for data analysis. The findings reveal a highly positive perception and motivation among students
in the online task. Intrinsic motivational factors were valued more than extrinsic ones, with intrinsic motivation being a significant predictor
of self-perceived translation skill improvement. The study suggests potential implications for translation pedagogy and research. This pioneering effort contributes to the limited literature, proposing an alternative to face-to-face peer assessment and paving the way for future
research in blended learning courses.

Keywords


Peer assessment; Translation; Online activity; Intrinsic motivation; Blended learning

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1]Baker, K. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3),

1–14.

[2]DiGiovanni, E. & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263–272.

[3]Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities.

[4]Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.

[5]Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27.

[6]Topping, K. (2018). Using Peer Assessment to Inspire Reflection and Learning, 103–127. Milton: Routledge.

[7]Gao,X., Raja,T., Chong, K. M., & Wu, M. (2023). Examining the Phenomenon of Juvenile Digital Addiction in Rural China. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(24), 273-282.

[8]Gao, X., Liu, J., Wang, S., Pertheban, T. R., Chong, K. M., & Yu, J. (2023, September). How Does Digital Traceability Impact the

Innovation Behavior of Food Firms Based on the Marketing Perspective? In 2023 3rd International Conference on Education, Information

Management and Service Science (EIMSS 2023) (pp. 617-624). Atlantis Press.

[9]Jonnavithula, L. (2008). Improving the interfaces of online discussion forums to enhance learning support. Massey University

[10]Sukumaran, S., Yu, J., Chen, D., Gao, X., Li, H., & Zeng, J. (2023, October). Examine the Student Perceptions of Online English

Language Learning in Primary Schools based on gender difference. In 2023 7th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social

Sciences (ISEMSS 2023) (pp. 2068-2074). Atlantis Press.

[11]Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, M. J. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241–252.

[12]Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment en_x005fvironments. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001

[13]Kim-Godwin, Y. S., Turrise, S., Lawson, S., & Scott, M. (2018). Student perceptions of peer evaluation in an online RN-to-BSN

course. Nurse Educator, 43(6), 317– 321. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000519.

[14]Kuo, Y. K., Batool, S., Tahir, T., & Yu, J. (2023). Exploring the impact of emotionalized learning experiences on the affective domain: A comprehensive analysis. Heliyon.

[15]Li, L., & Gao, F. (2016). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment

& Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 885–900.

[16]Lopes, A. P. (2011). Teaching with Moodle in Higher Educations: Polytechnic Institute of Oporto – IPP. INTED2011 Proceedings,

970–976.

[17]Moloudi, M. (2011). Online and face-to-face peer review: Measures of implementation in ESL writing classes. Asian EFL Journal,

52, 52, 1-73.

[18]Ngan, S. C., & Law, K. M. Y. (2015). Exploratory Network Analysis of Learning Motivation Factors in e-Learning Facilitated

Computer Programming Courses. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 705–717. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40299-014-0223-0.

[19]Yu, J., Sukumaran, S., Li, H., & Zeng, J. (2023). Examine Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Technology Integration in

Primary Education. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(26), 383-388.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i34.12089

Refbacks