• Login
  • Register
  • Search

The Washback Effect on Chinese EFL Teaching: Balancing Fluency and Accuracy in Chinese EFL Classrooms

Zhenduo Zhang

Abstract


The effects of testing systems on curriculum design, teaching practices, and learning behaviors are called the “washback effect” (Shohamy et al., 1996). This paper will focus on the current problems in the Chinese English testing system (CETS) and its influences on curriculum, teaching practices, and learning behaviors to show how washback negatively affects English teaching and learning in China. I will also offer possible solutions for improving Chinese English teaching situations.
We use the testing standard to modify our teaching practices. Our students will learn more comprehensively when we improve our teaching practices. In addition, because of the complexity of the washback effects and the ever-growing testing industry, knowing the testing system comprehensively is becoming more necessary (Saltana, 2018 & Kuang, 2020). In China, many English teachers say, “This knowledge is not included in the tests, and we do not need to focus on it.” Such an utterance indicated that teachers’ curriculums and teaching practices in China are always test-guided. So, exploring testing allows teachers to revisit their curriculums and teaching practices and develop updated teaching methods. Students’ learning behaviors can also be modifi ed.

Keywords


Chinese EFL classrooms;Testing System;Washback Effect

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Adamson, B., & Morris, P. (1997). The English curriculum in the People's Republic of China. Comparative Education Review, 41(1), 3-26.

[2] Cheng, L. (2008). The key to success: English language testing in China. Language Testing, 25(1), 15-37.

[3] He, D. (2013). What makes learners anxious while speaking English: A comparative study of the perceptions held by university students and teachers in China. Educational Studies, 39(3), 338-350.

[4] Hu, W. (2010). Communicative language teaching in the Chinese environment. Online Submission, 7(6), 78-82.

[5] Huang, X., & Hu, X. (2016). Teachers' and Students' Perceptions of Classroom Activities Commonly Used in English Speaking Classes. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 87-100.

[6] Jin, Y., & Fan, J. (2011). Test for English majors (TEM) in China. Language Testing, 28(4), 589-596.

[7] Kuang, Q. (2020). A Review of the Washback of English Language Tests on Classroom Teaching. English Language Teaching, 13(9), 10-17.

[8] Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language testing, 13(3), 298-317.

[9] Sultana, N. (2018). A brief review of washback studies in the south Asian countries. The Educational Review, USA, 2(9), 468-474.

[10] Sun, C., & Henrichsen, L. (2011). Major university English tests in China: Their importance, nature, and development. TESL Reporter, 44, 24-24.

[11]Sun, C., Wei, L., & Young, R. F. (2022). Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 382-410.

[12] Wang, B. (2017). The strategies on the Chinese college student’s English listening and speaking ability based on MOOC. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(2), 71-75.

[13] Xiao, Y., & Carless, D. R. (2013). Illustrating students’ perceptions of English language assessment: Voices from China. RELC Journal, 44(3), 319-340.

[14] Xu, J., & Fan, Y. (2017). The evolution of the college English curriculum in China (1985–2015): Changes, trends and conflicts. Language Policy, 16(3), 267-289.

[15] Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: college English test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408-417.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v8i4.13279

Refbacks