• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Segmental Versus Suprasegmental:Which One Weighs More Heavily in Teaching?

Chu-yuan Xu

Abstract


Language is composed of three elements:phonetics,vocabulary and grammar.Phonetics study is the primary and fundamental step in the attempt to master the target language as vocabulary and grammar are expressed through the medium of pronunciation.So,pronunciation is the basis of learning a language well and improving language skills for which any language learning will be inseparable from the learning of pronunciation.However,pronunciation can influence these two aspects.Researchers usually identify these features as segmental or suprasegmental.A long-standing debate in pronunciation teaching is whether segmental or suprasegmental is more important in facilitating intelligibility and comprehensibility.On the one side of the dispute,many authors argue that the priority should be given to suprasegmental features in pronunciation teaching because they are more useful than segmental features in understandable speeches.On the other side,some scholars believe that segmental features are more functional for promoting intelligibility,so they should be taught first in pronunciation teaching.However,based on the existing researches- ,although we have not attained an assertive conclusion of which one is more important in teaching,we can now regard segmental and suprasegmental features as an integrated system rather than separated entities(Zielinski,2015).Accordingly,it has an influence on the future decision-making as a teacher of English pronunciation which is the lesson design will include both segmental and suprasegmental parts in different but pertinent teaching order corresponding with the various teaching objectives or the learning preference of students.

Keywords


Segmental;Suprasegmental;Pronunciation teaching

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Anderson-Hsieh,J.,Johnson,R.,&Koehler,K.(1992).The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals,prosody and syllable structure.Language Learning,42,529–555.

[2] Collins B,Mees I(2013).Practical Phonetics and Phonology:A Resource Book for Students(3rd ed).London:Routledge.

[3] Derwing,T.,Munro,M.J.,&Wiebe,G.(1998).Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction.Language Learning,48,393–410.

[4] Derwing,T.M.,&Munro,M.J.(2015).Pronunciation fundamentals:Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

[5] Jenkins,J.2000.The Phonology of English as an International Language:New Models,New Norms,New Goals.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

[6] Munro,M.J.,&Derwing,T.M.(1995).Processing time,accent,and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech.Language and speech,38(3),289-306.

[7] Saito K(2011a).Identifying problematic segmental features to acquire comprehensible pronunciation in EFL settings:the case of Japanese learners of English.RELC Journal 42(3):363–78

[8] Zielinski BW(2015).The segmental/suprasegmental debate.In:Reed M,Levis J(eds)The Handbook of English Pronunciation.Hoboken,NJ:John Wiley&Sons,397–412.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v8i5.13459

Refbacks