Hesitation and Choice in the Application of “Flip Classroom” Teaching Model in Law Teaching
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Yang C, Sun M. How can graduate students flip the classroom to promote classroom discussion. Degree and graduate education, May 2017. p. 48-53.
[2] Wang S, Sun C, Wang W, et al. Flipping the “pseudo-interaction” of the classroom to the “real discussion” advanced. Navigation Education Research 2019; 3(36): 45.
[3] The six categories of “knowledge-understanding-application-analysis-synthesis-evaluation” referred to in this article refer to: knowledge refers to students’ cognition and memory of basic knowledge; understanding refers to students’ ability to understand the knowledge behind preliminary understanding of principles and laws; application means that students can initially apply correct principles and rules to analyze the corresponding phenomena; analysis means that students can decompose complex things into various simple elements and clarify the relationship between the elements; comprehensive means students can use the material draws conclusions about the content of the study and makes inferences about the legal issues that are consistent with the objective facts; evaluation means that the student can and has the opportunity to reflect on and evaluate the learning effect.
[4] Liu Y. An Analysis of the application of law flip classroom based on bloom education theory. Journal of Changchun University; December 2018. p. 104-105.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v4i8.2580
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.