An N-gram Analysis Japanese English Learners’ Writing: Focus on Grammatical Patterns
Abstract
their writing. Formulaic sequences, for example, n-grams or chunks are considered to be one of the criteria for teachers to level
learners’ language naturalness. The study analyzes Japanese and native learners’ academic writing, and finds that Japanese
learners always over-use/under-use certain n-grams. This indicates that Japanese learners prefer to use n-grams that is not frequent
used by native speakers. At the end of the study, some teaching methods and implications will be given according to the results.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Adel A, Erman B. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A
lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 2012; 31: 81-92.
[2] Biber D, Conrad S, Cortes V. If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics
2004; 25: 371-405.
[3] Biber D, Johansson S, Leech G, et al. Language grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman; 1999.
[4] Cheng W, Greaves C, Sinclair, J. M., et al. Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic
analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics 2008; 30(2): 236-252.
[5] Cortes V. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for
Specific Purposes 2004; 23: 397-423.
[6] Cortes V. Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and
Education 2006; 17+391-406.
[7] Granger S, Meunier F. Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2008.
[8] Hoey M. A world beyond collocation: New perspectives on vocabulary teaching. In M. Lewis (Ed.). Corpora and language
learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2004.
[9] Hong S. EFL learners’ consciousness-raising through a corpus-based approach. English Teaching 2010; 65(1): 57-86.
[10] Hong S. An n-gram analysis of maritime English. The Journal of Linguistic Science 2012; 61(2): 283-328.
[11] Pawley A, Syder F. Two puzzles for linguistic theory native like selection and native like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W.
Schmidt (Eds.). Language and communication. London: Longman; 1983.
[12] Schmidt R. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 1990; 11: 129-158.
[13] Schmidt R. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 1994; 11:
11-26.
[14] Scott M. WordSmith tool (version 5.0)
[Computer software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
[15] Sinclair J. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
[16] Wray A. Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v5i3.3474
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
