• Login
  • Register
  • Search

On “Being”: A Linguistic Perspective

Zitong Yang

Abstract


This research paper is dedicated to discussing the relationships between linguistics and philosophy, particularly in Ontology. It compares the differences in copula structures, especially “to be” in different languages and provides connections with ontology in Western and Eastern Philosophy to reveal the ontological differences derived from them. It analyzes texts from famous works of Aristotle, Descartes, and Lao-tzu to reveal the ontological similarities despite the differences in their languages' copulative structures. It concludes that linguistics largely shapes the way of different philosophies’ ontological basis, but linguistics and philosophy are like the integration of two parts that each has its emphasis.


Keywords


Philosophy; Linguistics; Philosophy of East and West; Pragmatics

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


Basson, AH., & O’Connor, DJ. (1947). Language and Philosophy: Some Suggestions for an Empirical Approach. Philosophy, 22(81), 49–65.

Blackburn, S. (1999). Chapter One Knowledge: Clear and Distinct Ideas. In Think: A compelling introduction to philosophy. Langara College.

Graham, AC. (1965). “Being” in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry. Foundations of Language, 1(3), 223–231.

Lao-tzu, & Waley, A. (2009). Tao Te Ching. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Shien, GM. (1951). Being and Nothingness in Greek and Ancient Chinese Philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 1(2), 16–24.

Wu, JS. (1969). Chinese Language and Chinese Thought. Philosophy East and West, 19(4), 423–434.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i7.4442

Refbacks