• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Comparison of TOEFL iBT and ESOL in Reliability

Zixin Li

Abstract


TOEFL iBT and ESOL are two language proficiency tests, and they are widely accepted by test takers worldwide. Both
tests assess test takers’ speaking skills, but they vary to some extent. This study will compare these two tests in terms of reliability
criteria.

Keywords


TOEFL iBT; ESOL; Rater reliability; Test reliability; Comparison

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Alderson, J. C., et al. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[3] Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

[4] Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language testing, 20(1), 1-25.

[5] Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive psychology, 11(4), 430-477.Ets TOEFL (n.d.) Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/toefl/ibt/about/content/Ets Org (n.d.)Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://www.ets.org/

[6] Gamaroff, R., (2000). Rater reliability in language assessment: the bug of all bears. System, 28(1), pp.31–53.

[7] Hughes, A., (2003). Testing for language teachers Second., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[8] Lee, J. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,763,098. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

[9] Luoma, S., (2004). Assessing speaking, Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

[10] Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage.

[11] Norton, J. (2005). The paired format in the Cambridge Speaking Tests. ELT journal, 59(4), 287-297.

[12] Orr, M. (2002). The FCE speaking test: Using rater reports to help interpret test scores. System, 30(2), 143-154.

[13] O’Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19(3), 277-295.

[14] Shohamy, E., (1983). THE STABILITY OF ORAL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT ON THE ORAL INTERVIEW TESTING PROCEDURES. Language Learning, 33(4), pp.527–540.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i9.4729

Refbacks