Study of the Rural Revitalization and Development in Tianzhu County of Guizhou Based on The Rural Collective Economy Model
Abstract
had greatly improved the industrialization structure’s upgrading and development due to the low degree of land intensification, the
difficulty of large-scale investment of funds, and the backward development and management concept. The proposal of the rural
revitalization strategy would provide an opportunity for the development of the rural collective economy. The research objectives
of this study were the impact of the rural collective economy model, the attitudes of residents toward economic growth, and strategies for economic development. Five independent variables, housing development, economic growth, financial security, quality
education, and health and safety, were set to test the relationship with residents’ attitudes on rural economic development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Chen, R. et al. (2014). The impact of rural out–migration on land use transition in China: Past, present and trend. Land Use Policy. Vol 40, p.101–110.
[2] Wang, Q. and Zhang, X. (2017). Three rights separation: China’s proposed rural land rights reform and four types of local trials. Land Use Policy. Vol 63, p.111–121.
[3] Fan, M. et al. (2015). Solving one problem by creating a bigger one: The consequences of ecological resettlement for grassland restoration and poverty alleviation in Northwestern China. Land Use Policy. Vol 42, p.124–130.
[4] Yan, H. et al. (2020). Rural revitalization, scholars, and the dynamics of the collective future in China. Journal of Peasant. Study. Vol 5, p.1–22.
[5] Wang, Y. et al. (2020). Land engineering consolidates degraded sandy land for agricultural development in the largest sandy land of China. Land. Vol 9, p.199-213.
[6] Xu, H. et al. (2020). Managing Rather Than Avoiding “Difficulties” in Building Landscape Resilience. Sustainability 2021. Vol 13, p.2629-2636.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i11.4929
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
