A Study on EFL Instructional Design from the Perspective of Cognitive Load Theory
Abstract
architecture to provide explanations for why certain designs of multimedia educational materials are effective and why some are
not. This study evaluated the split-attention and redundancy principles in an Intensive Reading lesson for non-English majored
students and their potential to decrease mental effort and increase learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293–332.
[2] Leppink J., Paas F. Cees P. M. et al. (2013) Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load, Behav Res 45:1058–1072
[3] Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (2nd ed., p. 43-71).New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Paas F., Renkl A.& Sweller, J. (2003)Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments, Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4
[5] Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 27-42
[6] Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 275–285.
[7] Sweller, J.(1994). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design, Learning and Instruction, 4, 293-312.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i15.5187
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.