The Dilemma of Public Organizations’ Participation in Collaborative Public Crisis Management and the Way Out
Abstract
severe test of the government’s overall governance capacity. The trend of modern public crisis management is to gradually move
toward collaborative governance with the participation of multiple actors. The more a modernized society develops, the more the
capacity of a single government entity is prone to failure, and the more it requires the participation of various social forces to play
a collaborative and functional role. The current ability of local governments to integrate resources and organize social forces is
facing many problems and challenges compared with the requirements of economic and social development. However, when a
country is facing a major public crisis, the power of public organizations is essential, and it is worth studying how to play its role
properly and create synergy with other forces.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Cai Zhiqiang. Value Change and Governance Growth - A Basic Study of Social Crisis Governance [D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2005.
[2] Decree of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China (No. 376), Emergency Response Regulations, Article 2. 2003-05-09.
[3] National Health and Wellness Commission. Announcement of the National Health and Wellness Commission of the People’s Republic of China [EB/OL]. 2020 No. 1.
[4] China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Level 1 Response Situation Analysis and Risk Assessment Group for Pneumonia Outbreak with Novel Coronavirus Infection. 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak Progress and Risk Assessment [EB/OL]. (2020-01-28).
[5] Xiao JY,Yao H. Collaborative governance: reflections on improving the capacity to respond to public health emergencies for prevention and control - taking the fight against new coronavirus pneumonia as an example [J]. Journal of Yunnan Administrative College,2020,22(04):134-140.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i16.5285
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
