• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Discussion on the Pros and Cons of Post-Bureaucratic Approach Towards Managing Contemporary Organisations

Hui Song

Abstract


Infl uenced by increasingly changed world context, some scholars argued the traditional bureaucratic form of organization is no longer applicable. On the contrary, there is an opposite hypothesis refers as post-bureaucracy, which attempts on an new organizational form that operates beyond the existence of rules, principles and hierarchies. Through learning from the experience of Netfl ix, it states that post-bureaucracy will contribute to the long-term sustainability, lower operational cost and a higher performance outcomes. Nevertheless, Wildfi re’s situation illustrate that with the increase in company scales and complication,post-bureaucracy will bring poor responsibility distribution, reluctant to communication, lack of formalization and problematic decision making. From bureaucracy to post-bureaucracy, it is more important for organisations to treat this choice as a matter of degree rather than of kind.

Keywords


Pros; Cons; Post-Bureaucracy; Degree

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Clegg, S., Harris, M. and Höpfl, H. (2011). Managing Modernity beyond bureaucracy? New York: Oxford University Press.

[2] Dias, & Vaughn. (2006). Bureaucracy, managerial disorganization, and administrative breakdown in criminal justice agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 543-555.

[3] Hall, R., (1963). The concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 32-40.

[4] Johnson, P., Wood, G., Brewster, C., & Brookes, M. (2009). The Rise of Post-Bureaucracy. International Sociology, 24(1), 37-61.

[5] Koivumäki, J. and Pyöriä, P., (2012). The Paradox of Post-Bureaucracy: Trust Formation among State Administration Employees in Finland. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 3(1), 115-125.

[6] Mccord, P. (2014). How Netflix Reinvented HR. Harvard Business Review, 92(1-2), 70-75.

[7] McEvily, B., Soda, G. and Tortoriello, M., (2014). More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure. Academ of Management Annals. 8(1), 299-345.

[8] Rapolienė, G. and Jakubė, A., (2015). Projects in Academic Institutions: Between Bureaucracy and Post Bureaucracy. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 4(2), 38-55.

[9] Reeves, M. et al.,(2012). Sustainability as Adaptability. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 24(2), 13-23.

[10] Torsteinsen, H. (2012). Why Does Post-Bureaucracy Lead to More Formalisation? Local Government Studies, 38(3), 321-344.

[11] Walton, E., (2005) The Persistence of Bureaucracy: A Meta-analysis of Weber’s Model of Bureaucratic Control. Organization Studies, 26(4), 569 - 600.

[12] Galunic, C. and Tierney W., (2015). Wildfire Entertainment: Organizational Structure Archetypes. Harvard Business Review.[Online]. Available at :< https://hbr.org/product/wildfire-entertainment-organizational-structure-archetypes/IN1175-PDF-ENG> .




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v6i20.6409

Refbacks