• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Comparing Traditional and Flipped Classroom in an EFL Reading Course - Engagement and Autonomy

Hua Cai

Abstract


This paper investigates the comparison between traditional learning and flipped learning in an elective reading course for 40 non-English majors in a university in China learning English as a foreign language. The findings show that 75% of students prefer flipped teaching and the engagement of 87.5% students in the classroom activities has increased. However, 17.5% of students prefer traditional learning and 47.5% of the students did not often watch the pre-class vocabulary videos before the class, which indicates low learner autonomy. Finally, implications of the survey are discussed.

Keywords


Traditional classroom; Flipped classroom; EFL reading; Engagement; Autonomy

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Abdullah, M. Y., S. Hussin, and K., Ismail. 2019. Investigating the effects of the flipped classroom model on Omani EFL learners’ motivation level in English speaking performance. Education and Information Technologies. 24: 2975-2995.

[2] Amiryousefi, M. 2017. The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 1-15. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307

[3] Challob, A. I. 2021. The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies. 26: 3743-3769.

[4] Hsieh, J. S. C., Y.M. Huang, and W.C.V. Wu. 2017. Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior. 70. 178–190.

[5] Dikilitas, K. and D. Yayli. 2018. Teachers’ professional identity development through action research. ELT Journal. 72(4): 415-424.

[6] Falola, H. O., O. O. Ogueyungbo, A. A. Adeniji, and E. Adesina. 2022. Exploring Sustainable E-Learning Platforms for Improved Universities’ Faculty Engagement in the New World of Work. Sustainability. 14: 3850.

[7] Fathi, J. and M. Rahimi. 2020. Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: a case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 11-39. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097

[8] Gu, J., L. Tang, X. Liu, and J. Xu. 2022. Promoting Pre-service Teacher Students’ Learning Engagement: Design-Based Research in a Flipped Classroom. Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810275

[9] Jang, H.Y. and H. J. Kim. 2020. A meta-analysis of the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes of flipped classrooms in higher education. Educ. Sci. 10: 115.

[10] Lee, G. and A. Wallace. 2018. Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly. 52/1: 62-84. doi:10.1002/ tesq.372

[11] Li, Z. and J. Li. 2022. Learner engagement in the flipped foreign language classroom: Definitions, debates, and directions of future research. Frontiers in Psychology. 1-6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810701

[12] Shahnama, M., Ghonsooly, B., and Shirvan, M. E. 2021. A meta‐analysis of relative effectiveness of flipped learning in English as second/foreign language research. Education Tech Research Dev. 69: 1355-1386.

[13] Steen-Utheim, A. T., and Foldnes, N. 2018. A qualitative investigation of students’ learning engagement in a flipped classroom. Teach. High. Educ. 23: 307-324. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2017.1379481

[14] Tsai, Y. 2019. Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1650779

[15] Turan, Z. and B. Akdag-Cimen. 2019. Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 33/5-6: 590-606. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i3.7190

Refbacks