• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Electronic portfolios and the five dimension model for reflecting on tertiary teaching

John Boereboom

Abstract


In New Zealand there is no formal requirement for certification or training to become a tertiary teacher. The pathway to become a tertiary teacher is more like an apprenticeship with professional development and training concurrent to teaching. Most universities offer a compulsory induction programme and a voluntary post-graduate certificate in tertiary teaching. Professional development opportunities for tertiary teachers are sporadic. There are frameworks for reflecting on tertiary teaching including the UK professional standards framework, AKO Aotearoa criteria for teaching excellence, the Education Council’s satisfactory teaching dimensions, the literature on the scholarship of teaching and learning and the content focus of the various post graduate certificates.

All of these sources were consolidated in the development of the five dimension model for reflecting on the dimensions of effective tertiary teaching. The model provides the structure for the development of online teaching portfolios which document career long professional development.  Critical reflections on the dimensions of effective tertiary teaching are structured around focusing questions and Brookfield’s (1995) lenses. The online portfolio can be used for promotion applications, fellowship applications and reflections for professional growth. The portfolio will be trialled at the University of Canterbury.


Keywords


Tertiary teaching; teaching philosophy; reflection; electronic portfolio; academic development

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


AKO (2017) Tertiary Teaching Excellence Awards: procedures , guidelines and criteria . Retrieved on 21 December 2016 from https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-4/procedures-guidelines-and-criteria---ttea-2017.pdf

Beaty, L. (1998). The professional development of teachers in higher education: Structures, methods and responsibilities. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 99–107.

Brookfield, Stephen. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1995.

Boereboom, J. (2015). Discipline-based reflective metaphors for teaching and learning: a framework for academic development in tertiary education.International Conference on Learning and Teaching, 29/9/2015.

Buzzetto-More, N. and Alade, A. (2008) The Pentagonal E-Portfolio Model for Selecting, Adopting, Building, and Implementing an E-Portfolio, Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, Volume 7, 2008

Cambridge, B.L. (2004). E-portfolios: Why now? Retrieved December, 2016, from http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id=28458cbhcp=1

Chism, N. V. N. (1998). Developing a philosophy of teaching statement. In Gillespie, K.H. (Ed.): Essays on Teaching Excellence 9 (3), 1-2. Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. Retrieved on 11 January 2017 from http://galois.math.ucdavis.edu/UsefulGradInfo/HelpfulAdvice/ProfDev/SCT_NancyVanNoteChisem.pdf

Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2008). The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 425-439.

Dieter J. Schönwetter, Laura Sokal, Marcia Friesen, and K. Lynn Taylor (2002) Teaching philosophies reconsidered:A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statement. International Journal For Academic Development Vol. 7 , Iss. 1.

Driessen, E. W., Van Tartwijk, J., Overeem, K., Vermunt, J. D. and Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005), Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education, 39: 1230–1235.

Education Council. (2016a). Becoming a teacher. Retrieved on 20 December 2016 from https://educationcouncil.org.nz/content/starting-your-career

Education Council. (2016b). Satisfactory Teacher Dimensions. Retrieved on 19 December 2016 from https://educationcouncil.org.nz/required/dimensions.pdf

ERO (2016) Dimension 2 Effective teaching retrieved on 19 December 2016 from http://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/evaluation-indicators-for-school-reviews/dimension-2-effective-teaching/

Higher Education Academy (2016) Accreditation. Retrieved on 19 December 2016 from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/services/accreditation

HEA. (2011) The UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education. The Higher Education Academy, Guild HE, Universities UK

Healey, M. & Jenkins, A. (2003). Discipline-based educational development. In H. Eggins & R. Macdonald (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lorenzo, G. & Ittelson, J. (2005a). An overview of electronic portfolios. EduCause Learning Initiative.ELI Paper 1: 2005. Retrieved 10/1/2017 fromhttp://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf

Ministry of Education. (2012). The New Zealand Curriculum Update.Issue 16. Retrieved on 14 january 2017 from https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Curriculum-resources/NZC-Updates/Issue-16-January-2012/Treaty-principles-Partnership

Ministry of Education. (2017). The Guiding Principles. Retrieved on 14 january 2017 from http://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/overall-strategies-and-policies/the-maori-education-strategy-ka-hikitia-accelerating-success-20132017/strategy-overview/the-guiding-principles/

Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice, London: Routledge Falmer.

Orland-Barak, L. 2005. Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains ‘untold’. Educational Research, 47(1): 25–44. doi:10.1080/0013188042000337541

Otago University (2016) Higher Education Development Centre. For Supervisors. Retrieved on 22 December from http://hedc.otago.ac.nz/hedc/programmes/supervising-research-students/

Reeves, T.R., Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (2002) Authentic activities and online learning. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Perth, Australia. 562 – 567.

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4): 842–866. (doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00181

Rogers, R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1): 37–57. doi:10.1023/A:1010986404527

Schönwetter, D. J., Sokal, L.,Friesen, M. & Taylor, L. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements, International Journal for Academic Development, 7:1, 83-97.

Spiller (2011) The Postgraduate Certificate in Tertiary Teaching, 2011 Handbook The University of Waikato

Stefani, L. & Elton, L. (2002). Continuing professional development of academic teachers through self-initiated learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 117–129.

University of Auckland (2016) Programme for new academics. Centre for Learning and Research in Higher Education. https://www.clear.auckland.ac.nz/en/na-staff.html

University of Otago. (2017). Postgraduate Certificate. Retrieved on 11 January 2017 from http://hedc.otago.ac.nz/hedc/about-us/our-postgrad-courses/postgraduate-certificate/

Wade, R. C. and Yarbrough, D.B. (1996). Portfolios: a tool for reflective thinking in teacher education? Teaching & Teacher Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 63-79

Young, S. F. (2008). Theoretical frameworks and models of learning: tools for developing conceptions of teaching and learning, International Journal for Academic Development

Vol. 13:1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v1i2.797

Refbacks