• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Risk and Individualization: An Inquiry About the Ethic of Accountability and Its Challenge to China’s Bureaucracy

Weijian Xi

Abstract


This article aims at the challenge to contemporary China’s bureaucracy despite its great economic achievement acquired in the past four decades since the Reform and Opening era and discusses within the sight of Risk Sociology how China manage to escape the trap of national governance such as the middle-class and involution traps,which can be used to interpret the rise and fall of post-industrialized countries.
In part one the overall performance of China’s economy and the challenge it faced are discussed;in part two the basic beliefs of contemporary China’s bureaucracy,especially those of local bureaucratic system was outlined and questioned;in the last part it’s argued that China’s evolution trend and self-orientation in the decadency of globalization should be shed light on that the fundamental transformation of China society occurred in the sphere of social individualization and its ethic consequence,which means the modernization of ethics both for the governments and the citizens.

Keywords


Risk; Individualization; Ethic of accountability; Bureaucracy

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Fung Yu-lan, 2007.A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, Tianjin:Tianjin Social Science Press.

[2] Shaomin Li, Judy Jun Wu.Why China Thrives Despite Corruption? Far Eastern Economic Review. Hong Kong: Apr 2007. Vol.170, Iss. 3; pp.24-25.

[3] Luhmann,Niklas.1993.Risk: A Sociological Theory, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

[4] Beck, Ulrich.1992.Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

[5] Beck, Ulrich.2010.A God of One’s Own: Religion’s Capacity for Peace and Potential for Violence.Trans.by Rodney Livingstone.Cambridge: Polity.

[6] Beck,Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim.2002.Individualization:Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.

[7] Barber,Benjamin R.2004.Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Twentieth-Anniversary Edition, The University of California Press.

[8] Bernstein, Richard J.1976.The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory.University of Pennsylvania Press.

[9] G.Hofstede.2011.Culture’s Consequnces:Comparing Values,Behabiors,Institutions,and Organizations Across Nations.Lon-don:Sage.

[10] Soeffner,Hans-Georg.1997.The Order of Rituals,trans.Maria Luckmann.New Brunswick,NJ: Transaction.

[11] Bellah, Robert N. 1967, Civil Religion in America.Daedalus 96.; Bellah,Robert N. and Phillip E. Hammond 1980,Varieties of Civil Religion.San Francisco: Harper and Row.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i12.8291

Refbacks