• Login
  • Register
  • Search

Exploring Educational Strategies for College Student Development Based on Disciplinary Characteristics

Wei Shi

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to explore educational strategies for college student development based on disciplinary characteristics.Each fi eld of study has unique demands and requirements,and students in each discipline may benefit from different educational approaches.Therefore,this paper presents strategies that are tailored to four major disciplinary categories:STEM,Humanities and Social Sciences,Fine Arts,and Business and Professional Fields.For STEM disciplines,hands-on,problem-based learning experiences are emphasized to develop practical skills.Humanities and Social Sciences focus on a theoretical and analytical approach to learning,emphasizing critical thinking and communication skills.Fine Arts emphasizes creative expression and experimentation,requiring a high degree of self-motivation and dedication.Lastly,Business and Professional Fields require a practical,hands-on approach to learning,focusing on teamwork,communication skills,and industry exposure.By tailoring educational approaches to the unique demands of each field of study,educators can help students develop the skills and knowledge they need to succeed in their chosen careers.This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of educational strategies that can be used to support college student development based on disciplinary characteristics.

Keywords


Educational Strategies;College students;Disciplinary Characteristics;STEM Disciplines;Humanities Disciplines

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1]National Science Foundation.(2017).Revisiting the STEM workforce.

[2]Jenkins,A.,&Healey,M.(2017).Developing undergraduate research and inquiry.York:Higher Education Academy.

[3]Wiggins,G.,&McTighe,J.(2011).Understanding by design.Alexandria,VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

[4]Prince,M.J.(2004).Does active learning work?A review of the research.Journal of Engineering Education,93(3),223-231.

[5]Shulman,L.S.(2002).Making differences:A table of learning.Change:The Magazine of Higher Learning,34(1),36-44.

[6]Association of American Colleges and Universities.(2007).College learning for the new global century.Washington,DC:Association of American Colleges and Universities.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i16.8919

Refbacks