Beyond the Involution of Education in China in Discussion Piaget’s and Vygotsky’ Theories
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Bidell, T. R. (1988). Vygotsky, Piaget and the Dialectic of Development. Human Development, 31(6), 329–348.
[2] Bruner, J. S. (1997). Celebrating Divergence: Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 40(2), 63–73.
[3] Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the Individual-Social Antinomy in Discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250–256.
[4 ]Erbil, D. G. (2020). A Review of Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning Method Within the Context of Vygotsky Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
[5] Flavell, J. H. (1996). Piaget’s Legacy. Psychological Science, 7(4), 200–203.
[6] Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281–295.
[7] Li, C. (2022b). From Involution to Education: A Glance to Chinese Young Generation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research.
[8] Meng-ying, L. (2021). “Nei Juan” in Exam-oriented Education in China. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 11(12), 1028–1033.
[9] Topçiu, M., & Myftiu, J. (2015). Vygotsky Theory on Social Interaction and its Influence on the Development of Pre-School Children. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 4(1), 172
[10] Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language.
[11] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i19.9421
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.