• Login
  • Register
  • Search

How Does Thinking About Contemporary China Challenge our Understanding of Contemporary Society and Culture More Generally?

Jinglong Li

Abstract


The continued development of the Internet has changed human life in an unprecedented way. In terms of information dissemination, it has changed how people traditionally receive and disseminate information, providing a virtual place for people to circulate information. Internet censorship is an essential and unavoidable part of distributing large amounts of information. Considering differences in education levels and other factors, people typically understand online censorship differently. Roberts (2020) mentioned that network censorship implies that when information is perceived to have the ability to undermine authority by being accountable to the public, authorities impose restrictions on the public’s public expression or access to information. These restrictions include Fear (intimidating people and thus limiting their behavior by imposing harsh penalties on those who make undesirable statements), Fiction (making it more difficult to access or even remove information that authorities consider sensitive), and Flooding (burying information that authorities consider sensitive under a mass of irrelevant information). For the Chinese, Roberts’ view is inconsistent with the concept of “serving the people and focusing on the people” claimed by the Chinese government, which has subverted most Chinese people’s optimistic view of the country and caused them to think deeply.

Keywords


Contemporary China; Challenge; Social and cultural; Understanding

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Bennett, W.L. and Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp.739–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661.

[2] Chadwick, A. (2017) The hybrid media system : politics and power / [electronic resource]. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[3] Denyer, S. and Wang, A.Z. (2018) Chinese women reveal sexual harassment, but# MeToo movement struggles for air. The Washington Post, 9.

[4] Hsiung, P.-C. and Wong, Y.-L.R. (1998). Jie Gui - Connecting the Tracks: Chinese Women’s Activism Surrounding the 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing. Gender History, [online] 10(3), pp.470–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.00114.

[5] KING, G., PAN, J. and ROBERTS, M.E. (2013). How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review, 107(02), pp.326–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000014.

[6] LIU, M. and CHAN, C. (1999). Enduring Violence and Staying in Marriage. Violence Against Women, 5(12), pp.1469–1492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10778019922183471.

[7] Meng, B. (2011). From Steamed Bun to Grass Mud Horse: E Gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese Internet. Global Media and Communication, 7(1), pp.33–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766510397938.

[8] Roberts, M.E. (2020). CENSORED : distraction and diversion inside china’s great firewall. S.L.: Princeton University Pres, pp.21–92.

[9] Yang, G. (2014). Internet Activism & the Party-State in China. Daedalus, 143(2), pp.110–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00276.

[10] Yin, S. and Yu, S. (2020). Intersectional digital feminism: assessing the participation politics and impact of the MeToo movement in China. Feminist Media Studies, 21(7), pp.1176–1192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1837908.

[11] Zeng, J. (2020). #MeToo as Connective Action: A Study of the Anti-Sexual Violence and Anti-Sexual Harassment Campaign on Chinese Social Media in 2018. Journalism Practice, 14(2), pp.171–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1706622.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v7i19.9423

Refbacks