Normative Foundation of Artificial Intelligence in International Dispute Settlement: Challenges to the Interpretation and Application of International Law Rules
Abstract
This paper focuses on the normative foundation of artificial intelligence (AI) in international dispute settlement, and analyzes the
classification of its application scenarios, the core connotation and necessity of the normative foundation from a professional and technical
perspective. It emphasizes the exploration of the adaptation dilemma between algorithmic logic and legal principles in the interpretation of
international law rules under AI application, as well as the fairness predicament caused by data bias in the application of rules. Corresponding optimization strategies are proposed, including a normative system of “hard law supplementation + soft law precedence”, an application
mechanism of “pilot verification + dynamic adjustment”, and a technical guarantee of “algorithmic transparency + data diversity”. These
strategies provide practical paths for addressing the challenges in the interpretation and application of international law rules.
classification of its application scenarios, the core connotation and necessity of the normative foundation from a professional and technical
perspective. It emphasizes the exploration of the adaptation dilemma between algorithmic logic and legal principles in the interpretation of
international law rules under AI application, as well as the fairness predicament caused by data bias in the application of rules. Corresponding optimization strategies are proposed, including a normative system of “hard law supplementation + soft law precedence”, an application
mechanism of “pilot verification + dynamic adjustment”, and a technical guarantee of “algorithmic transparency + data diversity”. These
strategies provide practical paths for addressing the challenges in the interpretation and application of international law rules.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; International Dispute Settlement; Normative Foundation; Interpretation of International Law Rules; Application of International Law Rules
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Aligning with International Rules to Build a Preferred Destination for Cross-border Commercial Dispute Resolution [N]. China
Business News, 2025-07-25 (A02).
[2] Wu, Q. The International Mediation Institute Provides a New Platform for the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes [N].
Legal Daily, 2025-05-26 (005).
[3] Cheng, H. E. Injecting New Momentum and Certainty into the Transformation of International Dispute Mediation Mechanisms [J].
National Governance, 2025, (09): 75-80.
[4] Zhuo, L. Study on the Governance of Cyber Attacks under International Law and China’s Solutions [D]. Beijing Foreign Studies
University, 2023.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ag.v9i1.14183
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
